Wednesday 26 February 2014

My Country is NOT Deteriorating. My response to "Deteriorating Democracy in Malaysia" by Azeem Ibrahim.



Introduction
[1]    In my description of my blog above, I have stated that I care and believe in my country and her future. Thus, when I read Azeem Ibrahim’s piece which was published in Huffingtonpost.com (link here), I was a little taken aback by the certainty of the language and the resoluteness that Malaysia’s democracy is deteriorating.

[2]    Nevertheless, my surprise faded somewhat at the end when the author declared his formal and official support of Anwar Ibrahim specifically and Pakatan Rakyat generally. I understand. In the game of politics, it’s normal to raise the allegations of mala-administration against the Barisan Nasional, particularly when you are a PR supporter. But even if he wasn’t, he does raise genuine and legitimate concerns plaguing the country – though his article does fall a little short in the substantiation department as it plays mainly on sentiment.



[3]    Essentially, I disagree with article on 4 reasons. Perhaps he can come back with a response. That would be nice.

[4]    This article is a bit long – go straight to the part that interests you if you want.

a.       Eroding Racial Harmony: The Bipolarity of Pakatan Rakyat
b.      World Press Freedom Index: What is doesn’t consider
c.       The Allah Issue: BN Schizophrenia, PR Inaction
d.      The Popular Vote: Oh Enough Already

[5]    The focus of this article will be on addressing some of Azeem’s views.

Sunday 23 February 2014

Bantuan Rakyat 1 Malaysia (BR1M): 4 Reasons Why It Is Good and Necessary

Introduction

 [1]   BR1M 2014 was launched yesterday, 22 February 2014 to some fanfare. According to reports, RM4.5 billion has been allocated for BR1M 2014 which would benefit some 7 million people.

[2]   Personally, I am a fan of the initiative, as I believe targeted subsidies are the way to go – let those truly deserving get government assistance, and for people like me, we can take care of ourselves.

[3]   Personally, I stand to lose from BR1M. I am not entitled to it, and any reduction in subsidy will mean I pay more for certain goods (and being in the middle income bracket, I’m not rich enough to the point that it wont matter *Sad face*).

[4]   Nevertheless, I feel that the benefit to those who really need the targeted subsidy outweighs my personal (and financial) interest.

[5]   And yes yes, if the Government plugged leakages and wastages, strengthened the economy etc. etc. we’d be in a much better position, financially and purchase power-wise, but hey, that’s a grouse for another day (and don’t worry, I won’t let that go. Just waiting for the next Auditor-General report).

[6]   In this article, I want to look at BR1M and write about the 4 reasons why BR1M is good an necessary. I do not think it is political candy (and my staunch-opposition economist friends say that it’s in fact a good idea – but PR cant say that). So, here’s a preview of the 4 reasons:

            a.      A web of benefits;
            b.      Targeted subsidies are the future;
            c.       Right time;
            d.      Br1M is more sophisticated than it looks.